Sunday, January 8, 2017

The Lantern in Combat



Domenico Angelo's The School of Fencing (1787) includes a section on how to confront an opponent who employs a “dark lanthorn” – a lantern with a panel that slides to block the light.  Evidently, footpads would equip themselves with a sword and lantern in order to commit their depredations.  According to Angelo, “there are severe punishments inflicted upon on those who are found sword in hand with a dark lanthorn...”  Reportedly, such a criminal would keep the lantern's panel closed, thereby maintaining darkness.  When the robber approached close enough to shine a beam of light into the victim's eyes, he would open the panel.  This would temporarily blind the victim, thereby facilitating the footpad's goal.

If such tactics were viable in the real world, why not apply them to dungeon delving?  Subterranean entities with sensitive eyesight might be particularly susceptible.  How would the mechanics work?  Perhaps, first of all, a successful 'attack' should be made on the part of the lantern wielder.

Starting with Moldvay's D&D and continuing with subsequent editions of 'basic', a 'Light' spell cast at a target's eyes would cause blindness for the duration of the spell (assuming the target fails a saving roll vs. Spells).  “In D&D BASIC rules,” the spell description states, “a blinded creature may not attack.”  This effect may be more severe than what a non-magical light would be expected to accomplish; yet it provides a precedent.  Edition 3.5 indicates that a “dazzled” character has an attack roll modifier (both melee and ranged) of -1.  Additionally, the Armor Class of a “blinded” character is detrimentally modified by 2 (and no Dexterity bonus is applied).  In fifth edition, attacks by a blind character “have disadvantage” while attacks against a blind character “have advantage.”  The fifth edition “condition” of blindness seems appropriate for our purpose.  But what about a saving throw?  For 'basic', like the 'Light' spell, a saving roll vs. Spells may be apt.  The 3.5E 'Sunburst' spell allows a Reflex save to avoid blindness whereas the same spell in 5E indicates a “Constitution saving throw.”  A blinded character is entitled to “another Constitution saving throw at the end of each of its turns” (to a maximum duration of 1 minute I suppose) in order to recover.  I am inclined to favor a Wisdom saving throw rather than Constitution, since Wisdom governs perception.

Depicted below is a lantern shield, a 'real world' weapon that incorporates a lantern for the purpose for blinding or dazzling an opponent.  It seems rather abundantly accessorized to be of much practical value, still they would not have been made if there was no demand for such things.  Seemingly, lantern shields were not intended for combat but rather intimidation.  Of course, in an elfgame, there is nothing to prevent a lantern shield from being a common piece of adventuring equipment.



3 comments:

  1. Doe anyone (do you?) strictly enforce what's going on with light during combat? Do people put down their torches or lanterns on the ground? (I assume torches keep burning.) Or do some fight while holding a light source? It would seem as if targeting the guy with the light would be a smart way to go if the monsters were intelligent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ideally, playing out combat should be a quick, streamlined affair. Strict enforcement of light rules is not conducive to this end. That said, the light-in-the-eyes tactic is likely best employed at the onset of combat. (Perhaps in conjunction with surprising the opponent?) I would think that in the midst of melee, aiming a light at someone’s face is less practical than other combat options.

      With regard to “targeting the guy with the light,” this is the precise reason we have linkboys. It’s best to fetter them so they don’t run away.

      Delete
  2. Way back in my larping days a buddy and I found a way to use some lame "light potions" we found (they were pastic glowsticks).
    We keep the glowsticks inn pockets or a pouch and if we met aa plausible mark or two we'd toss one or two glowsticks up in the air over their head to land on the ground behind them, without fail everyone would look up at he sticks and fail to notice us drawing weapons before it was too late.

    ReplyDelete