Many role-playing games of the early 80s offered a Gamemaster Screen as an accessory and TIMEMASTER™ is no exception. However, in its case, the proper name is Timemaster Screen. I guess they thought 'Continuum Master Screen' had too many syllables. The screen itself is three panels of cardboard. The CM's side has a black & white Action Table and various tables of movement and combat modifiers. It conveys pertinent information capably. How may wound boxes does a medium horse have? 13. Helmets have what Immunity Type? B. How many rounds does it take for a specialist to reload a crossbow? 10.
The players' side is not as fulsome. On one panel is displayed the skills chart which is useful when creating characters. However, in the Travellers' Manual, the skills chart extends over two pages. To condense the chart to one panel, some information was removed; specifically, the 'Date Avail.' column is absent. Yet the Notes related to that column are still displayed:
Date. The earliest time period in which the skill was available. This affects the skills available to newly created characters.This is somewhat simplistic. It's not as though horses were immediately available throughout the Americas as of 1521. What about places other than the Western Hemisphere? Horses weren't in Japan until the late Yayoi period and they didn't reach Australia until 1788. This defies the notion of “any non-American.” Sometimes it's better to forgo detail and prevail upon common sense.
Any non-American. This skill is not available to newly created characters born in the Americas before 1521, when the Spanish introduced the horse to the continents.
The other two panels of the players' side are actually the front and back covers of the product. Some of the back copy reads:
The TIMEMASTER™ Screen puts the important charts and tables from the TIMEMASTER game right at the CM's fingertips. Inside you'll find four blank character sheets and MISSING: PT 109 – a high-action mini-adventure that features new rules for combat at sea.As usual for Gamemaster Screens, a “mini-adventure” was included as an additional feature. Design of the mini-adventure is attributed to TSR veteran Carl Smith, who is also credited with 'Additional Design and Development' in the Travellers' Manual. Smith's name appears on the front and back covers. The top of the back cover reads, “TIMEMASTER™ SCREEN by Carl Smith.” Presumably, this refers to the mini-adventure, not the screen itself. A significant portion of the back cover is devoted to a map (shown left). Unfortunately, it's not needed for the adventure and lacks important details like 'scale' and 'north'. Otherwise, the back cover has some teaser text describing the Amagiri - PT 109 incident. This is followed by a notice that Nixon was elected in 1960, suggesting some sort of cause and effect relationship.
The 16 page booklet packaged with the Timemaster Screen contains the mini-adventure as well as the “four blank character sheets” mentioned above. Each character sheet has on its reverse an Action Table and essential combat details. The four character sheets comprise the eight center pages of the booklet. They are perforated so that they can be easily separated from the booklet and one another. Other than the material on the reverse, the Timemaster Screen character sheet differs from the Travellers' Manual version by having nine additional lines on the “Skills” and “Times Visited” columns.
The much vaunted “new rules for combat at sea” are attributed to Mark Acres and they occupy one entire page. As opposed to the scale for land combat, naval combat has hexes of 300 yards and each turn represents a minute of time. Of note are rules for new weapons (like torpedoes) and naval vessel damage (one possibility is “Hull hit; ship will sink in 2d10 hours unless repaired”).
Two-thirds of the last page of the booklet is devoted to credits and two pre-generated characters: Timothy O'Malley (an Irish veteran of World War I) and Michael Whitehorse (a Native American of the 19th century). This leaves 6⅓ pages for the mini-adventure. A special rule for Stealth is included “that is not a regular part” of the TIMEMASTER™ rules. “Throughout the adventure,” we read, “characters may use this skill for the benefit of the entire party, not just themselves.”
In the Time Corps briefing, the player characters are informed that John Fitzgerald Kennedy died in 1989 and was an “Oil magnate whose dealings with Third World countries contributed to the decay of the Western economies.” They also learn, “The Sentinel reports that Kennedy's life is pinpricked with a slew of Demorean contacts.” Apparently, the Sentinel determines that the “Demorean penetration occurs on Olasana Island, just before the crew of PT 109 arrives.” So, the player characters – in the in the guise of U.S. Navy personnel – go to “the Soloman (sic ) Islands” on August 4, 1943. “Another Time Corps team has left a PT boat” for the player characters to pilot to Olasana Island before Kennedy and crew encounter the natives that will bring about their rescue. Supposedly, “under the most likely conditions [the player characters] will have one day” to disrupt the Demorean plot.
The point of having the player characters use a PT boat is so they will engage in combat encounters (using the new naval combat rules) against the Japanese. This allows the mini-adventure to be “high-action.” I mean, if the player characters operated a medical vessel, they could avoid combat. Female characters could plausibly be on a medical vessel, but certainly not a PT boat.
The Demoreans have established a faux Japanese POW camp on Osalana Island. If the player characters are defeated in the combat encounters, the Japanese will take them to this camp. How do the Japanese know about this camp given that (1) it was established “just before the crew of PT 109 arrives” and (2) it is not a legitimate Japanese facility?
The player characters' PT boat has three combat encounters. The first encounter is with a destroyer. Although it is not specifically named as the Amagiri, the historical changes chart at the end of the adventure implies it. If the player characters sink the ship (or continue to damage it after it is disabled), they are penalized significance points. The second encounter is with two Japanese patrol boats. The commander of one of them is named Lt. Fubuki. (The Amagiri is a Fubuki-class destroyer.) The player characters are penalized significance points for each death they cause among the crew. The last encounter is with a Zero. The player characters lose significance points “if they shoot down the Zero after it has begun its retreat.”
Kennedy is unconscious in the POW camp as one of the Demoreans attempts to “Dominate” him. Domination is one of the Demorean paranormal talents. “To use this PT,” the Travellers' Manual states, “a Demorean must first spend one full day near his victim...” If the Demorean successfully uses the talent, then domination over the victim progresses in stages. At Stage 5, “The victim follows any suggestions or plans the Demorean gives him.”
If the player characters fail their mission, history is altered in various ways. One possibility is that “Japanese domination of the world automobile market is delayed five years” because one of the soldiers killed “would have become a top automotive engineer.” In the worst possible outcome:
The end of World War II is delayed by six months, allowing the U.S.S.R. to enter the war. Soviet expansion in the Pacific is checked during the Presidency of John F. Kennedy, but proceeds apace after his death in 1963. A major war over Pacific holdings erupts in 1969; the nuclear holocaust of 2054 occurs in 1970 instead.Wait, wasn't the whole point that JFK doesn't become president?
Seems you totally misread that "any non-American" section of misunderstood it. All its says is anyone born in the Americas prior to that date can't have horsemanship skills because they'd never encountered a horse.
ReplyDelete(Of course, this ignores the fact that horses are actually from the Americas and spread to Asia later so if you were born long enough ago you certainly would have encountered them.)
Perhaps I was not clear in my nitpicking. What the author intended is evident. I was expressing my opinion (which is admittedly petty and not necessarily reasonable) the the author should not have bothered.
Delete